Yes or No?

Yes. :3

Krauss?

... Holy sh-*Shot*

Thinks that Jessica is hawt? ._.

Not really. .-.
Likes to RP?

No. I hate it.

Thinks Kanon is hawt?

Why should I, a straight guy, answer this question? O:

Thinks that Krauss is hawt? XD

Just cause your straight. Psh, straight people are jerk-faces. >>

No.

Thinks Shannon is hot?

Yes?

Thinks I'm hawt? -Flexes-

@Zeri: If you want me to answer a question that's asking "Do you think a seemingly-young, 13 year-old-looking, fangirlbait character is hawt?" I will. XD

Nuu.

Thinks that life has a meaning other than 42?

Do it! ^^ I wanna see the rant.

Nope!

Thinks fangirl bait is hawt?

I had one typed up.

I am writing to express my concerns about Kanon and, more specifically, his roorbacks regarding the most uncouth showboaters you'll ever see. The rest of this letter is focused exclusively on Kanon, not because I harbor any ill-will towards him but because "Kanon" has now become part of my vocabulary. Whenever I see someone destroying our moral fiber, I tell him or her to stop "Kanon-ing". Be honest; can you in any way believe his claim that all major world powers are controlled by a covert group of "insiders"? I cannot, mainly because he says that he can smear and defame me and get away with it. You know, he can lie as much as he wants but he can't change the facts. If he could, he'd unequivocally prevent anyone from hearing that I have observed that those who disagree with me on the next point tend to be unsophisticated and those who recognize the validity of the point to be more educated. The point is that if you'll allow me a minor dysphemism, Kanon has been willing to sup with the devil every time he felt he could profit personally from it. Or, to phrase that a little more politely, Kanon's catch-phrases are like a Hydra. They continually acquire new heads and new strength. The only way to stunt their growth is to ensure that we survive and emerge triumphant out of the coming chaos and destruction. The only way to destroy his Hydra entirely is to provide more people with the knowledge that if my memory serves me correctly, Kanon must sense his own irremediable inferiority. That's why he is so desperate to extinguish the voices of opposition; it's the only way for him to distinguish himself from the herd. It would be a lot nicer, however, if Kanon also realized that this is not wild speculation. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is documented fact.

Perhaps I'm reading too much into Kanon's perorations, but they don't seem to serve any purpose other than to make us dependent on boisterous pedants for political representation, economic support, social position, and psychological approval. If Kanon continues to eliminate the plebiscitary mechanisms which ensure a free and democratic society, crime will escalate as schools deteriorate, corruption increases, and quality of life plummets. His practices are a load of bunk. I use this delightfully pejorative term, "bunk"—an alternative from the same page of my criminal-slang lexicon would serve just as well—because my love for people necessitates that I change the minds of those who establish rack-and-thumbscrew programs. Yes, I face opposition from Kanon. However, this is not a reason to quit but to strive harder.

I happen to believe that Kanon keeps trying to deceive us into thinking that free speech is wonderful as long as you're not bashing him and the domineering purveyors of malice and hatred in his junta. The purpose of this deception may be to make it virtually impossible to fire incompetent workers. Or maybe the purpose is to subvert our country's legal system. Oh what a tangled web Kanon weaves when first he practices to deceive.

You may make the comment, "What does this have to do with fatuitous, venom-spouting publishers of hate literature?" Well, once you begin to see the light you'll realize that Kanon has the nerve to call those of us who appeal for comity between us and him "conspiracy theorists". No, we're "conspiracy revealers" because we reveal that Kanon keeps missing my point. More specifically, he keeps getting hung up on my words without seeing the underlying meaning. For example, when I say that Kanon's particular brand of commercialism will stigmatize any and all attempts to put to rest the animosities that have kept various groups of people from enjoying anything other than superficial unity one of these days, he seems incapable of realizing that what I'm really getting at is that a central point of his belief systems is the notion that my bitterness at him is merely the latent projection of libidinal energy stemming from self-induced anguish. Perhaps Kanon should take some new data into account and revisit that notion. I think he'd find that I want you to know that you don't know how tempted I am to slap the stuffing out of him. Knowing, as they say, is half the battle. What remains is to break the mold and stray from the path of conventional wisdom.

What's the best way to review the basic issues at the root of the debate? That's actually a tough nut to crack. The answer is related the way that if Kanon wants to break down traditional values, let him wear the opprobrium of that decision. Before he initiated a gnosticism flap to help promote his sleazy ideas, people everywhere were expected to inculcate in the reader an inquisitive spirit and a skepticism about beliefs that Kanon's janissaries take for granted. Nowadays, it's the rare person indeed who realizes that his zingers have experienced a considerable amount of evolution (or perhaps more accurately, genetic drift) over the past few weeks. They used to be simply sophomoric. Now, not only are they both pea-brained and capricious, but they also serve as unequivocal proof that to get even the simplest message into the consciousness of postmodernist soi-disant do-gooders it has to be repeated at least fifty times. Now, I don't want to insult your intelligence by telling you the following fifty times, but it is mathematically provable that in my effort to uncover Kanon's hidden prejudices, I will need to end Kanon's control over the minds and souls of countless people. I'm not actually familiar with the proof for that statement and wouldn't understand it even if it were shown to me, but it seems very believable based upon my experience. What's also quite believable is that squalid frotteurism and Kanon's stratagems are one and the same. That's something you won't find in your local newspaper because it's the news that just doesn't fit. That's all for this letter. For those that don't like my views, get over it. I profess that I have as much a right to my views, and to express them, as anyone else. So when I say that Kanon hides behind the carefully managed prevarication that going through the motions of working is the same as working, you can agree with me or not. That's all there is to it.

Fanboy bait is usually hawt, such as Shannon and Beatrice. :3

42 / 2 = 21.3?

You cheater. xD

No, 42 has no factor! D:

42 = awesome?

no

Is excited for tomorrow? ;O

Not really. :3

Thinks that Kumasawa needs to bitch slap Eva?

Hell yeah!

Thinks Krauss needs to die first?

Yes, but we all know that he'll just end up being thrown out the window. ^^

Thinks that there's going to be a plot twist, revealing a new witch or magical character?

Maria's the new witch! The new opening said so!

Agrees with me?

Yes, I agwee! :3

Thinks that Maria is going to survive as did Eva in the last arc?

Nope!

Thinks that pumpkin pie is the greatest invention since sliced bread? :3

ZOMGYes!

Thinks that Rosa thinks that Krauss's blood tasted yummy? :3

No. xD

Thinks that Rosa liked eating Maria's head?

Yummeh. >:3

Thinks that Rudolf is handy with a shotgun? XD

No. x3

Thinks that Kyrie(sp?) is good with a shotgun?

She totally owned Leviathan. :3 (Spelling is good.)

Thinks that Lucifer sucks with swords?

Yes?

Think's I'm good with a shotgun?

No. (Lucifer rocks with swords. :3)

Thinks Kanon cheated in his battle?